Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous | Next

Hello? Is this thing on?

The silence from LJ is deafening. How can they ignore 5 days' worth of replies that max out at 10,000, all of them overwhelmingly negative? This is bigger than Strikethrough 2007 or any of the myriad other dramas LJ has had. I have to say, I'm really, really disappointed, and wish I were just a little more surprised. *sigh*



Sep. 7th, 2010 09:00 pm (UTC)
There were a few back in the day (2008-ish) that maxed out at 5,000, back when that was the limit. I don't remember when the limit was increased.

Apparently you didn't read dawna's entry or you didn't take it to heart, so let me quote: "Additionally, it's always been possible for someone to grab a link to any post that you have granted them access to, screencap your entry, and repost it all over the internet, including Facebook and Twitter. The idea that this allows people to repost things that they couldnt before is not true. This is true in a community or your journal. You should always be aware that what you post on the internet is never truly private. Friends locking something does not prevent someone from reposting or blabbing your content all over the internet or world for that matter. If you do not wish something to be put out there, do not put it on the internet, period." That fact could be why LJ management didn't regard this as a serious security breach, because it's not. However, I don't work with or speak for the Russians, so I never quite understand their priorities.
Sep. 7th, 2010 09:14 pm (UTC)
Yes, Mike, that's already been pointed out a myriad of times. My point is, why make it EASY to do so? A handy-dandy little clicky button is just BEGGING for trouble. If they'd actually asked their paying customer base, I think they'd have found this was a huge "do not want," or at the very least a "need to be able to opt out." Given all the fuckups in the past, it shocks me they so still so blindly move forward with stuff like this (and no doubt the exodus to Dreamwidth is substantial, even if it's not every single person that said they would).

It really doesn't matter if it's an actual breach of privacy, it's a matter of perception - as I said, if you're going to build a community of trustworthiness, LJ has repeatedly shown how *not* to foster that with their membership.

Of course, I further question the point of posting comments without the context of the OP anyway. WTF is up with that? It would be half a conversation. Makes no sense to me...

Latest Month

August 2019


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner