Esprix (esprix) wrote,

  • Mood:

Marriage, ahoy!

So the court battle begins already. As harlkyn posted in his LJ, civil rights groups have already filed a lawsuit claiming that the proposition isn't merely an amendment, but fundamentally changes the state constitution, which is a no-no if it violates existing rights. Since the California Supreme Court has already ruled previous laws violated those rights, it seems like (hopefully) a 'natch. It's a shame this has to happen in the courts, but that's pretty much how it's always been expected to go down.

Then again, I rather like sftyson's idea - since the argument is that the 'mos are ruining marriage, we should propose a few amendments to outlaw the REAL culprits. How about making divorce illegal? That fucks up more families than a few thousand queers, right? Or maybe adultery should be prosecuted a bit more harshly? In fact, I think we should require marriage licenses be more like the bar exam or medical boards - people should study and test and get trained. After all, that would save more marriages, wouldn't it? :)
Tags: legal, liberal rubbish, politics, queer issues, righteous rage, san diego

  • 4 years finally over!

    Gone. Finished. Done. Good riddance. BUH-BYE, loser.

  • Bernie & the DNC

    So Bernie Sanders' supporters are planning a march in Philadelphia "against the DNC." Here's what I don't get - Sanders has for his entire political…

  • Clinton's lead

    I don't post this to be negative about Sanders (as I've said repeatedly, I like him), but to point out some math that makes sense to me: "For Bernie…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded