?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous | Next

Huh?


When did LJ go from "previous 20" to "previous 10?"

Tags:

Comments

( 18 comments — Comment )
jbriggs
May. 27th, 2010 07:55 pm (UTC)
Mine's been and still is previous 25.
merlinwon
May. 27th, 2010 08:15 pm (UTC)
yeah.. i just noticed that as well..
esprix
May. 27th, 2010 09:38 pm (UTC)
See the comment below on how to fix it. Worked for me. :D
klynn330
May. 27th, 2010 08:31 pm (UTC)
Mine says previous 15...
robearal
May. 27th, 2010 08:34 pm (UTC)
The "previous" number may be set by whatever style you are using. There is a setting somewhere where you can change it.
esprix
May. 27th, 2010 09:35 pm (UTC)
I never changed any settings - it just changed on me today. I think I can fix it, though.
(Deleted comment)
esprix
May. 27th, 2010 09:38 pm (UTC)
Oooo, aren't you a clever one, then? :D THANK YOU! The powers that be must have updated my theme from 20 to 10 without letting anyone know.
av8rmike
May. 27th, 2010 10:28 pm (UTC)
They did, and somewhat mistakenly, I think.
(Deleted comment)
nolly
May. 27th, 2010 11:44 pm (UTC)
They just changed it -- I got a news post right after this one which included that. It's to cut down on load times, but the announcement includes the link to where to fix it. I've had mine set to 50 forever, because I prefer fewer loads, even if the loads take a bit longer. But I also use an old-school custom S1 style, because I don't really like the fancy prebuilt S2 styles, and don't have the time to figure out how to re-create my current style in the current system.
(Deleted comment)
nolly
Jun. 1st, 2010 04:41 pm (UTC)
No, just the one. I don't have it set up to email them, though; I just see the posted copy, and I haven't been seeing duplicates. Maybe they're making minor edits?
esprix
May. 28th, 2010 03:53 am (UTC)
I just got that update. I understand their rationale, but it might have been nice to tell people *before* they did it.

I think I switched to S2, but I'm using the default layout, which I like 'cause it's clean and simple. I went ahead and changed my setting to 50 entries as well, though, 'cause I'm with you - I'd rather a longer page to look at all at once.

Edited at 2010-05-28 03:54 am (UTC)
nolly
Jun. 1st, 2010 04:44 pm (UTC)
I suspect the change and the post may have been near-simultaneous. I think you'd be right if LJ were entirely or almost entirely made of rational people with good reading comprehension, but I suspect that if they posted it enough ahead of time for a significant number of people to see it, they would be slammed with a flood of "It's not working for meeee!" whines from people who don't notice the "coming soon".
akirashima
May. 28th, 2010 02:15 am (UTC)
evidently to spite you
[ << Previous 25 ]
chewableprose
May. 28th, 2010 06:23 am (UTC)
Hehe, thanks for posing this question ... I noticed this too, but didn't give it much of a thought. Now I know.
colinblackthorn
May. 30th, 2010 07:14 pm (UTC)
About eleven back. I can see how you would've missed it.
( 18 comments — Comment )

Latest Month

August 2017
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner