?

Log in

Previous | Next

Two queens in a pod

So yesterday the Board of Directors of the SCA, after a months-long debate period, ruled thusly (and unanimously):

"Each competitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a prospective consort of the opposite sex unless the Crown has elected to permit a competitor to fight for a prospective consort of the same sex."

What that means is that two men or two women can now fight to be King and King or Queen and Queen of their kingdom, with the caveat that the currently reigning King and/or Queen has the option to deny them entry to the competition.

This is what we're calling "inspirational equality," as the idea behind it is to have the ability to fight for the one who truly inspires you, regardless of who it might be. It's also not just an LGBT issue - who says a daughter can't fight for their mother, or a brother fight for his brother, if that's who truly inspires them to greatness?

Given this dialogue only seriously started just a couple of years ago (something we queers in Clan Blue Feather had been kidding around about for 20 years), this is a huge first step. Alas, the BoD didn't take a more decisive forward step by leaving that caveat in, but based on what I know of their deliberations, they felt like they hadn't gotten a clear mandate like they'd hoped (they recently did a Society-wide census and although a majority favored equality, there were clearly areas of the map that did not). Given that, they came up with this imperfect (ha!) step. I'm hopeful that it will prove to the nay-sayers that not only is it not a bad thing, but it's actually a very good thing for the SCA, and the Society won't crash and burn because of it. (Similarly, the SCA got better when they made other changes, such as letting women fight, making positive changes for the disabled to access events, etc.; we're supposed to be re-creating the best of the Medieval period, after all.)

So, being all excited, a lot of people started celebrating this victory, even while acknowledging there is still more work to be done (it will definitely be interesting when the first royal couple decides to deny a same-sex couple the right to fight, which will likely end up back in the BoD's lap and we'll have to re-evaluate yet again, but I'm confident equality will win out in the end). And certainly there were those who were opposed to the idea altogether that have rumbled and threatened to boycott any same-sex reign and whatnot. What I found most disappointing, though, were the ones who supported IE but who were also grumbling about it, that it didn't go far enough, that it wasn't really a victory at all, etc. Certainly they had a point, but I felt their timing was kind of shitty.

After getting into a couple of online discussions about it, I wrote this to a friend on LJ:

"... I'm more concerned that [so many people] were so quick to jump on the news as bad rather than good. Not only did it feel like my feelings were being shit on, but [also on] all those who were taking a moment to celebrate the progress before buckling down for the next wave of work to be done (not saying you or anyone did it intentionally, that's just what came through my filters). It also kind of struck me that the first person I saw post about it was Master Guiseppe (joeguppy), who has not only worked hard for this change (as in personally in touch with members of the BoD discussing the matter passionately), but is also the husband and co-Baron of the first same-sex baronial pair in SCA history (along with Master Giles). When a whole bunch of people come down quite vocally and basically say, 'Stop celebrating, this isn't a win at all!', it read to me like a backhanded slap to [them]. ([They] didn't take any of it that way, but I did.)"

I'm more than willing to admit that some of this also stems from other things going on of late (as in several people, friends and strangers alike, both disrespecting me and feeling free to shit all over my feelings), but the whole idea of one group of people telling another group of people that they were wrong for feeling so happy about what they saw as positive change just struck a nerve. Then again, maybe I'm just a cranky old man... MAYBE. :P

Regardless, I, personally, am quite pleased with this step, and I realize there are more steps to take to make the SCA a better place for all those involved. Onward! :)

Comments

( 4 comments — Comment )
klynn330
Dec. 10th, 2012 09:28 pm (UTC)
Americans (and maybe others, I don't know, I don't live there) do suffer from an ALL OR NOTHING mentality, and we do not like slow, steady, sustainable growth. We fail to acknowledge improvements in many different areas, which I will not list here, as I do not want to discuss those issues online, thank you very much. I'm not sure what people think it is supposed to do...make people more motivated to work harder maybe? I'm not sure, but I do recognize it as a trait, and I find it distressing.

I, for one, am thrilled. Even allowing people the choice for now, will help everyone really understand the opinions of the people they are working with and will allow them to voice their opinions, where before there wasn't even an opening for a conversation.
esprix
Dec. 11th, 2012 05:38 pm (UTC)
I think a lot of it comes from the pace we've become accustommed to - "Instant gratification takes too long," as Carrie Fisher once wrote. It's similar to the chick-fil-A boycott - people seemed to think that once the company knew there was a boycott, they'd change their stance on marriage equality overnight. Er, no - that's not how boycotts work. It took almost 30 years for the Coors beer boycott to see the changes they wanted to effect in their hiring policies and ending their discriminatory practices. People are just impatient.

I do have to say though that even though I know the BoD considered it carefully, I am disappointed by their hand-wringing over it all, especially given some things that were said after the decision was made. But, what's done is done - moving forward! :)
gullinbursti
Dec. 10th, 2012 09:54 pm (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure most of the people naysaying the decision understand that this is essentially how Crown Lists have always worked -- the Crown can prohibit anyone from entry for whatever reason they deem appropriate. "All entrants must be acceptable to the Crown" or some such has been in every Kingdom Law I've looked at. (The SCA, as I have always liked to say, is not a democracy!)

In the past though, they weren't allowed to let a man fight for a man, or a woman for a woman. Now they have that right per Corpora. Overall, it's a win.
esprix
Dec. 11th, 2012 05:42 pm (UTC)
Those who want equality want it NOW, and I don't blame them for that. I think, though, that this is a stepping stone. First, the general concensus seems to be that no king/queen will want to be "THOSE royalty" who denied someone who was otherwise completely qualified the right to fight (although I've been saying since the decision that the first denial will be just as important as the first approval). Second, those kingdoms (and the populace) that are against the idea of IE need some time to adjust to the idea of same-sex monarchs, and see that no, the SCA will not suddenly burst into flames, fall over, and then sink into the swamp. Third, this is all going to end up back in the BoD's lap eventually anyway, and then they'll do the right thing and remove even that weaselly wording (still leaving the individual crowns the right to deny someone from the list, of course, but *hopefully* by then it won't be over something as unimportant as who their inspiration is).

Time will tell, though...
( 4 comments — Comment )

Latest Month

July 2017
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner